[SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
Ralph Holz
holz at net.in.tum.de
Mon Nov 7 14:36:00 PST 2011
- Previous message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Next message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Hi,
>> That's the point Phillip was referring, too. But the more interesting
>> question to me seems here: if CAs = the companies operate sub-CAs, why
>> do so many CA = companies have several root certificates in NSS?
>
> I think everyone here agrees that multiple CA certificates does not equal
> independent sub-CAs.
I was just wondering why some companies have added several root certs in
the past, and others haven't. I think I once went through the NSS root
store and found that this number is also unequally distributed.
> The Microsoft trusted root certificate program does a clearer job of
> indicating which root CAs are controlled by which organizations.
>
> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/2592.aspx
That's useful. I think Kathleen Wilson of Mozilla operates a similar
list, although when I checked it a while ago I didn't find it too
accessible.
Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.eff.org/pipermail/observatory/attachments/20111107/31a1d0e4/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Next message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Observatory
mailing list