[HTTPS-Everywhere] Turning HSTS headers into HTTPS Everywhere rules?

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Thu, Sep 11 2014, yan <yan at mit.edu> wrote:
> One potential downfall is that this would make the ruleset list very
> large, and HTTPS Everywhere is probably less efficient at doing its job
> than HSTS.

This is sort of an odd comment, isn't it?  Isn't the fundamental model
of https-everywhere to have a ruleset for every site on the web?

jamie.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/https-everywhere/attachments/20140911/95550e78/attachment.sig>