[HTTPS-Everywhere] µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared · gorhill/uBlock Wiki · GitHub
Alex Xu
alex_y_xu at yahoo.ca
Sun Dec 28 07:23:37 PST 2014
On 27/12/14 06:18 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote:
> This is an interesting analysis of how much CPU and memory AdBlock Plus consumes, finding it to be rather high. It would be great to do a similar analysis on HTTPS Everywhere, see we do similar things and probably have similar performance issues.
>
> https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared
> _______________________________________________
> HTTPS-Everywhere mailing list
> HTTPS-Everywhere at lists.eff.org
> https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/https-everywhere
>
HTTPS-Everywhere does not load any CSS in content pages, as that is
entirely irrelevant to its purpose.
CPU overhead I believe to be negligible, especially considering that
HTTPS-E rules use a basic domain matching mechanism before considering
regular expressions.
Memory overhead is significant, but has been reduced recently due to the
introduction of the internal SQLite database.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/https-everywhere/attachments/20141228/98ffb3a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the HTTPS-Everywhere
mailing list