[SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
Jacob Appelbaum
jacob at appelbaum.net
Thu Nov 3 18:35:16 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Next message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 11/03/2011 05:27 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> People who throw stones...
>
> Seems to me that EFF and Moxie have been holding everyone else to a certain
> standard these past few months.
>
> I don't think that either would accept 'recognized and acknowledged' as an
> excuse.
>
>
> In the case of Convergence the site does not say a blessed thing about the
> proposal. Not a squeak, not a sausage. It is pure marketing glitz with
> fancy graphics but no substance.
>
If someone is going to accuse an open source project of being a backdoor
they could at least link to the offending code.
This rumor is a bunch of bullshit and I can't believe it spilled onto
this list too.
All the best,
Jacob
- Previous message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Next message: [SSL Observatory] Perspectives on Convergence of EFF, EPIC, SSL, TOR, NSA, ET CETERA
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Observatory
mailing list