<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    On 17/10/2015 11:50 pm, kyungsinpark wrote:<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:001d01d1092e$30caaeb0$92600c10$@korea.ac.kr"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Malgun Gothic";
        panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Malgun Gothic";
        panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Malgun Gothic";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:3.0cm 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="word-break:break-hangul"><span
            lang="EN-US">Manila Principles should definitely take action
            on this.  <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="word-break:break-hangul"><span
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="word-break:break-hangul"><span
            style="font-family:"Malgun Gothic"">“</span><span
            lang="EN-US">Feels that the internet giants should be made
            aware of their responsibilities so that they delete illegal
            content as quickly as possible;</span><span
            style="font-family:"Malgun Gothic"">”</span> <span
            style="font-family:Wingdings" lang="EN-US">à</span><span
            lang="EN-US"> This will very easily translate into a general
            monitoring obligation. </span></p>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I agree.  I met with two policy officers from the European
    Commission last week to discuss the Manila Principles with them. 
    Although internally the Commission supports retaining the
    fundamentals of the existing regime, there is considerable political
    pressure to act against intermediaries who are seen as profiting
    from content without sharing that revenue with content providers
    (which means: ancillary copyright) and against intermediaries who
    host illegal content "actively" rather than "passively" (which
    means: establishing a duty of care, and making Content ID and
    notice-and-staydown compulsory).<br>
    <br>
    I also met separately with some industry representatives, who are of
    the view that we should open up the Manila Principles to endorsement
    by industry groups.  The initiative actually came from their side,
    in view of the trajectory of the platform consultation and also new
    obligations on intermediaries at the national level in countries
    like Austria.  I tend to support this idea, since we have already
    established a strong base of civil society support for the
    Principles, so that there is no longer any danger that this could be
    seen as an industry-pushed initiative.  Bringing industry endorsers
    in now would only strengthen our case to push back against these
    adverse policies.<br>
    <br>
    What do others think?<br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://eff.org">https://eff.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jmalcolm@eff.org">jmalcolm@eff.org</a>

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt">https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt</a>
PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD

Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en">https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>