[Manila Principles] EuroParl draft report on prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations

Jeremy Malcolm jmalcolm at eff.org
Sun Oct 18 02:22:32 PDT 2015


On 17/10/2015 11:50 pm, kyungsinpark wrote:
>
> Manila Principles should definitely take action on this. 
>
>  
>
> “Feels that the internet giants should be made aware of their
> responsibilities so that they delete illegal content as quickly as
> possible;” àThis will very easily translate into a general monitoring
> obligation.
>

I agree.  I met with two policy officers from the European Commission
last week to discuss the Manila Principles with them.  Although
internally the Commission supports retaining the fundamentals of the
existing regime, there is considerable political pressure to act against
intermediaries who are seen as profiting from content without sharing
that revenue with content providers (which means: ancillary copyright)
and against intermediaries who host illegal content "actively" rather
than "passively" (which means: establishing a duty of care, and making
Content ID and notice-and-staydown compulsory).

I also met separately with some industry representatives, who are of the
view that we should open up the Manila Principles to endorsement by
industry groups.  The initiative actually came from their side, in view
of the trajectory of the platform consultation and also new obligations
on intermediaries at the national level in countries like Austria.  I
tend to support this idea, since we have already established a strong
base of civil society support for the Principles, so that there is no
longer any danger that this could be seen as an industry-pushed
initiative.  Bringing industry endorsers in now would only strengthen
our case to push back against these adverse policies.

What do others think?

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD

Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/manilaprinciples/attachments/20151018/086618dd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/manilaprinciples/attachments/20151018/086618dd/attachment.sig>


More information about the ManilaPrinciples mailing list