[HTTPS-Everywhere] ideas for improvements to development and use of the ruleset

[Paul Wise]

On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

> Yeah, that is why I suggest only submitting domains rather than rules.
> When you get new domains submitted by users you can pro-actively check
> the ruleset, test the domains from multiple network points and update
> the ruleset.

On that note, do submissions from the SSL observatory get turned into
HTTPS Everwhere rulesets at all?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/https-everywhere/attachments/20140331/112cc939/attachment.sig>