[HTTPS-E Rulesets] rules for torrentfreak, securityweek.

[Osama Khalid]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Andreas Jonsson wrote:
> So what do we decide on then? Commiting rules with names like
> "domain.tld" or simply "domain"? I prefer the domain.tld, considering
> the rapid growth of rulesets.

We are talking about filenames, right? The likelihood of having two
different rulesets with the same domain but with different TLDs is
very limited given that the ultimate majority of websites do not
support HTTPS anyways.

In addition to that, I think we shouldn't change the current way
because of the problem you mentioned earlier of having rulesets that
cover many domains (I can currently recall Google.xml, Mozilla.xml and
Torrentz.xml).

--Osama Khalid
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.eff.org/pipermail/https-everywhere-rules/attachments/20110406/eb975437/attachment.sig>