[DC-Trade] New IGF Dynamic Coalition on Trade and the Internet
Maryant Fernández
maryant.fernandez-perez at edri.org
Fri Feb 17 10:13:46 PST 2017
Dear Jeremy,
Dear all,
Thank you very much for putting this together; for your efforts and
energy on this!
I like the proposals. I just have two comments regarding
- the need for the dynamic coalition: building on the Open digital trade
coalition experience, it'd probably be better if we only covered the
process, not concrete public policy issues.
I don't see any rough consensus among stakeholders regarding most of the
internet governance issues identified.
- the action plan for 2017:
* "identifying the key internet governance issues that are the subject
of such agreements and negotiations" => describing them in a neutral way
is ok (e.g. network neutrality is covered in some trade agreements, such
as x, y, z). However, we should clarify that there will not be an
assessment of/analysis of/recomendations on those issues. We should
concentrate our efforts on the second bullet point (the process). Here,
there is a lot of work to be done.
I'm looking forward to working together with all of you.
Best,
Maryant
--
Maryant Fernández Pérez
Senior Policy Advisor
European Digital Rights
Rue Belliard 20
B- 1040 Brussels
http://edri.org
Tel: +32 2 274 25 70
PGP: D59A 1D3F 50CC 231B DCFE 3F2C 92FA 6F29 3D74 0B42
Subscribe to the EDRi-gram, our fortnightly roundup of digital rights
news! http://edri.org/newsletters/
Em 09/02/2017 19:07, Mazzone, Giacomo escreveu:
>
> Thank you Jeremy,
>
> I entirely subscribe to what you say.
>
> In case you think could be useful for the other participants, these
> are the links to EBU positions papers on TTIP (ENG and FRA)
>
> https://www.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/ebu/files/Publications/Position%20Papers/EBU-Position-EN_Trade%20negotiations%20on%20TTIP_14.07.2014.pdf
>
>
>
>
> https://www.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/ebu/files/Publications/Position%20Papers/EBU-Position-FR_trade_negotiations_TTIP_14.07.2014.pdf
>
>
>
>
> This is the page of EBU website dedicate to trade issues.
>
>
>
> Thank you Jeremy again for your timely initiative to which we are
> proud to participate.
>
>
>
> Giacomo
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Jeremy Malcolm [mailto:jmalcolm at eff.org]
> *Sent:* jeudi 9 février 2017 02:28
> *To:* Mazzone, Giacomo <mazzone at ebu.ch>; Maryant Fernández
> <maryant.fernandez-perez at edri.org>; David Snead
> <snead at i2coalition.com>; Susan Aaronson <saaronson2 at verizon.net>;
> William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>; Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> <raquino at gmail.com>; dc-trade at opendigital.trade
> *Subject:* New IGF Dynamic Coalition on Trade and the Internet
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> You have all expressed interest in being among the founding members of
> a new multi-stakeholder IGF dynamic coalition on Trade and the
> Internet. I'm writing to you about the next steps towards its formation.
>
> We are required to produce:
>
> 1. *The need for the dynamic coalition* - see below.
> 2. *An action plan* - see below.
> 3. *A mailing list* - this is the first message to it (cc'd to you
> individually, so that if it went into your spam, you can adjust
> your filter settings).
> 4. *The contact person(s)* - for now, this is me.
> 5. *A list of representatives from at least three stakeholder groups*
> - Giacomo Mazzone from the European Broadcasting Union has offered
> to represent the private sector, David Snead from the Internet
> Infrastructure Coalition to represent the Internet technical
> community, and we have several including myself for civil society.
> 6. (Recommended) *A blog or website* - this is at
> https://opendigital.trade/projects/dc-trade
> <https://opendigital.trade/projects/dc-trade>, although it has no
> content yet. If you haven't already registered here (I think this
> only applies to Giacomo), please do so.
>
> I suggest the following text to express "the need for the dynamic
> coalition":
>
> Many Internet governance issues that are discussed at the IGF are
> also the subject of rulemaking through bilateral, plurilateral and
> multilateral trade agreements. The purpose of this Dynamic
> Coalition is to provide an interface for the exchange of
> information and best practices between the negotiators of these
> trade agreements and the bodies in which they work, and the
> Internet Governance Forum and its multi-stakeholder community.
> This information exchange will be both substantive (that is,
> concerning particular Internet public policy issues) and also
> procedural (that is, about how Internet public policy can be
> developed in a transparent and inclusive way).
>
> And here is what I suggest (a little more tentatively) for an initial
> action plan for 2017. These items are based around the existing work
> of the Open Digital Trade Network (which most of you are already part of):
>
> * To publish a background paper mapping the major trade
> agreements that are in place or under negotiation, as well as
> the venues where this takes place, and identifying the key
> Internet governance issues that are the subject of such
> agreements and negotiations.
> * To develop a multi-stakeholder consensus around a set of
> recommendations for the improvement of the transparency and
> inclusiveness of the practice of international trade
> negotiations and domestic consultation processes.
> * To build a network of representatives from trade institutions
> and delegations for liaison with our Dynamic Coalition and the
> broader IGF community.
> * To hold our inaugural meeting at the 2017 IGF in Geneva to
> present our outputs to the IGF community.
>
> I am seeking your feedback. Can you please respond with your thoughts
> about the above proposals by *17 February*?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> --
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org <mailto:jmalcolm at eff.org>
>
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ***************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> swept by the mailgateway
> ************************************************** *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.eff.org/pipermail/dc-trade/attachments/20170217/26fbcfe7/attachment.html>
More information about the Dc-trade
mailing list