[Companion-announce] Advisory group update: Sprint, handout, whitepaper!

lindsay lindsay at eff.org
Wed Dec 18 14:05:12 PST 2019


It appears that the attachment was stripped from the email - here is a linked version! Please let us know if you have issues accessing it.

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1bxgVPC9xN2RucR73hrXkz_116SJx5KgRg5ZEhaxpaqk/edit#slide=id.p1

-Lindsay

> On Dec 17, 2019, at 12:47 PM, lindsay <lindsay at eff.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Hope your holiday season is going smoothly (if you celebrate). We’re winding down for the end of year here, and looking to 2020 for some new endeavors and efforts to improve our resources.
> 
> SEC Sprint
> In January (possibly February), we’ll be doing a sprint to update SEC. We’ll be basing this on our own internal feedback from staff trainers, and also incorporating feedback from external trainers who have graciously agreed to test specific resources in the field - including a group of librarians across San Francisco (heroes), some of our excellent comrades in the Electronic Frontier Alliance, and some of you lovely people on this list.
> 
> In case you have feedback for us as well on any particular lesson, here are the questions we asked our testers.
> 
> Feedback Questions for SEC Testers
> 
> I. Previous Knowledge
> 	• What misconceptions did people have? 
> 	• How did people have to reframe or change their minds?
> 	• What knowledge that you thought was obvious did you have to make explicit? 
> 	• Where did you make logical leaps and people had to ask what something meant or how you got there?
> II. Enhancement of Learning with Graphics
> 	• Where would a graphic have been useful? 
> 	• Did you search for an image of something that didn’t quite work and you wished you had a better version of?
> 	• If you drew diagrams to help foster understanding, could you provide those as an example for us?
> III. Engagement 
> 	• What made people super engaged?
> 	• What strategies or examples made concepts click for learners? 
> 	• Alternately, where did things slow down? 
> 	• Where were people struggling to connect to the material?
> IV. Confusion and Concern
> 	• What were people confused by or had a lot of questions about? 
> 	• Areas of conspicuous silence? 
> 	• What were people overwhelmed by? What made people feel hopeless or nihilistic?
> 	• Were there any questions people didn’t know how to answer? 
> 	• Where did people need priming to think about topics before they could give answers?
> 	• Were there instances where you had to give alternate examples or definitions? What and why? Are there places where it would be good to have more or different examples?
> V. Extension of Learning
> 	• What wasn’t covered that you wish you could have covered?
> 	• Were time estimates correct? 
> 	• If you had to spend more time on something, what was it, why, and how did you explain?
> 	• Did you add things to the lesson that you felt were important to cover?
> 
> Malware handout (attached as a PDF) 
> This resource was co-created with some of our friends on this list and trainers working with at-risk groups. For their privacy, we won’t say who, but they know who they are and they are appreciated. So far it’s been legal-reviewed and tech-reviewed — we just want to get a few non-EFF trainers to look at it before we share it with the world. Any chance that can be you? (Feedback especially appreciated before January.)
> 
> Third party tracking whitepaper
> https://www.eff.org/wp/behind-the-one-way-mirror
> Soraya, Caitlyn and Bennett worked on a slew of graphics to explain how third-party tracking works. We’re hoping to eventually turn this into a resource for SSD (with the goal of explaining how Privacy Badger works in the ad network ecosystem), but that’s likely some time from now. In the meantime, feedback on the educational graphics would be super helpful and appreciated. 
> 
> In Summary: Action Items!
> 	• Do you have specific feedback on SEC resources? Fill out the feedback questions for testers and send it back to us.
> 	• We’ve created a malware resource and could use expert review. Review the malware handout (attached) and respond with your thoughts.
> 	• We created a third party tracking whitepaper and graphics. If there are any considerations on this topic that we should know as we plan our content creation (and that we can eventually turn into a SSD guide or SEC lesson), send us your thoughts.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Lindsay and Soraya
> _______________________________________________
> Companion-announce mailing list
> Companion-announce at lists.eff.org
> https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-announce



More information about the Companion-announce mailing list